Abstract

Public material around nanniang (男娘) has grown into a research field rather than a single-definition problem. Character descriptions, cross-dressing and makeup tutorials, cosplay, creator biographies, video titles, tags, danmu, historical news, forum posts, Japanese otokonoko (男の娘), English femboy, and recent Chinese platform forms such as Nanliang / Xiao Nanliang (南梁 / 小南梁) regularly meet in the same search environment. The next useful object is therefore a map that can absorb new evidence over time. When a reader encounters a new post, video, character, or label, the map should show what to inspect first and how far the available evidence can support a claim.

This topic hub reorganizes GenderLibs’ recent research into six reusable entry points: speaker; referent and practice; page position; historical pathway; community circulation; and strength of evidence. Together they form a research compass. The map helps a general reader understand what a label is doing in a concrete scene, while giving editors, researchers, and agents a method for deciding whether a source belongs in a definition, chronology, platform analysis, cultural history, or continuing observation. The recent Chinese expression 雌堕 provides a useful stress test: public examples currently span SFW gender-expression discussion, adult culture, fiction, and personal narrative. The most informative next step is layered sampling by speaker and scene rather than premature stabilization into one meaning.

The central contribution is to treat the usage event as the basic research unit. A usage event records who used a form, whom or what it referred to, what observable practice was present, where the word appeared on a page, when and on which platform it occurred, and what evidence preserves the event. Terms become historical and community networks through these linked events. This approach lets fictional character types, clothing practices, audience nicknames, creator self-descriptions, platform tags, and cross-language borrowings retain their distinct functions while still belonging to one research system.

Keywords: nanniang; weiniang; cross-dressing; otokonoko; Nanliang; platform culture; community language; research method; Bilibili; digital archive

1. Research question: what should a map let a reader do?

In recent Chinese public-platform material, nanniang has become a highly visible entry term. A Bilibili tutorial may place nü zhuang (女装, cross-dressing or feminine clothing practice) in the title, use nanniang for the target audience or theme, and place Nanliang in a series name or creator bio. Other pages co-tag CD, TS, MTF, cosplay, makeup, fitness, and body styling. Japanese creators continue to publish posts about otokonoko, josō, cosplay, makeup, photography, and everyday presentation. English SFW communities continue to discuss femboy as a self-label connected with style, presentation, and community membership. A reader arriving through search therefore encounters a network of people, actions, media positions, and historical pathways.

Several research traditions already explain important pieces of that network. Kinsella’s work on Japanese otokonoko publishing and cross-dressing subculture connects character industries, aesthetics, and embodied practice. King, Glasspool, Winge, and Matsuura and Okabe show how cosplay joins costume, makeup, photography, performance, and peer learning. Liu Shan’s work on Chinese transgender digital practice gives a framework for public self-presentation and platformed authenticity (Kinsella 2020a; Kinsella 2020b; King 2023; Glasspool 2023; Liu 2023). Platform studies add another layer: titles, tags, series, audience feedback, and imagined algorithms shape how creators package material for visibility (Poell, Nieborg & van Dijck 2019; DeVito 2022; Shen et al. 2021).

GenderLibs’ recent sequence has already covered five distinct questions. A context guide separated character classification, clothing practice, audience naming, platform labels, and self-description. An encyclopedia article traced multiple sources of contemporary nanniang culture. A Nanliang / Xiao Nanliang case study followed a homophonic joke into nicknaming, tutorial audiences, series branding, and cross-community circulation. A chronology traced shifts from weiniang to nanniang in Chinese public records. A Bilibili observatory then separated six page positions: title, tag, series, bio, comment/danmu, and search entry point. The present task is best understood as an integration problem: how can those answers become one method that readers can reuse?

The research question is practical: when a new piece of nanniang-related evidence appears, what sequence of observations places it reliably within historical and community context? The answer is a six-entry-point map. The entry points can be combined flexibly, but they can also serve as a stable coding sheet. A new spelling tomorrow, a new platform next month, or a newly recovered archival page can enter the same coordinates and remain comparable with existing evidence.

2. Materials and method: restoring the usage event

The internal baseline is the bilingual GenderLibs research published and publicly verified from August 5 through August 10, 2026. This hub also returns to the academic literature, publisher records, creator pages, Bilibili material, historical reporting, Tieba discussion, Japanese creator writing, and English SFW community material used in those studies. The fresh community scan continues to prioritize public creator and community usage on Bilibili, Japanese note, and English public communities. Recent usage is discovered from community evidence first; academic work is used to explain mechanisms and historical context, while archival and publisher sources anchor dates and publication facts.

The usage event is the basic record. Each event asks six questions: who is speaking; whom or what the expression refers to; which observable action or practice is present; where the expression sits on the page; when and where the event occurred; and what kind of evidence preserves it. If a creator writes nanniang in a profile, the event records first-person creator language, a person-level self-description, and the bio position. If a tutorial title uses nü zhuang, the event records creator-to-audience language, a practice description, and the title position. If viewers use Xiao Nanliang in danmu, the event records audience language, nicknaming or joking, and an interaction position. One word can produce many events, and one event can contain several words.

This approach draws on a common lesson from digital ethnography and platform research: fields supplied by a platform shape expression, while users adapt those fields according to their own theories about audiences, visibility, and moderation. Bishop’s research on “algorithmic gossip” among YouTubers, DeVito’s study of folk theories among transfeminine TikTok creators, and Shen and colleagues’ work on everyday algorithm auditing all show users drawing practical conclusions from visible platform outputs (Bishop 2019; DeVito 2022; Shen et al. 2021). Bilibili adds synchronous danmu, so a page accumulates audience language directly over the creator’s framing (Wang 2022).

The method assigns different evidentiary jobs to different source types. Scholarship supports mechanisms, history, and comparison. Community and platform pages establish current use, page position, and dated repetition. Publisher catalogs establish titles and products. Public creator profiles establish public self-description. Search pages establish that a string functions as a discovery query. Historical reporting establishes contemporaneous public framing. The six-entry-point map is a way of keeping those jobs visible while connecting them.

3. Entry point one: identify the speaker

The same characters can perform very different social actions depending on who uses them. A creator placing a term in a bio is arranging a durable public persona. A viewer placing it in a comment or danmu may be naming, praising, joking, classifying, or joining a shared viewing performance. A journalist may use a term to build a quick category for unfamiliar readers. A platform may place a string in a search or category surface as part of product organization. Recording the speaker first sharply reduces the risk of turning an audience label into someone’s self-description.

Historical Chinese material around weiniang illustrates the value of this distinction. Reporting around the 2010 television contestant Liu Zhu preserves both media labeling and the subject’s own response, placing two naming positions inside one public event. Later Bilibili pages place nü zhuang dalao, nanniang, CD, TS, and related labels side by side, while creators and audiences may use them for different purposes. The chronology from weiniang to nanniang is therefore also a chronology of who gets to name whom.

Japanese material offers a second comparison. Kinsella’s analysis of otokonoko magazines and publishing markets centers character types, commodities, and male subculture, while current Japanese creators on note and personal sites describe makeup, cross-dressing, cosplay, and everyday practice in first person (Kinsella 2020a; Kinsella 2020b). Similar visual aesthetics can therefore be described by publishers, scholars, creators, and audiences in four different registers. The research map preserves each register before asking how the registers interact.

English SFW communities reinforce the same point. The public r/feminineboys community is organized around member discussion of presentation, style, experience, and boundaries, giving femboy a clear first-person community function in many threads. Research on LGBTQ digital visibility likewise emphasizes the role of self-presentation, public hashtags, and networked affiliation in community formation (Duguay 2016; Jackson, Bailey & Foucault Welles 2020). Cross-language work becomes more accurate when speaker position is preserved before any comparison among labels begins.

4. Entry point two: separate referent from practice

Person labels and practice terms often share the same image. A creator may wear feminine clothing, apply makeup, use a wig, pose for photographs, and publish the result under a page carrying nü zhuang, cosplay, nanniang, and Nanliang. Nü zhuang most directly records clothing and presentation practice; cosplay connects the event to character performance and fan culture; nanniang may refer to a person, theme, or community; Nanliang may function as a nickname or meme-layer label. Describing the visible action before interpreting the label allows practice and person-language to remain distinct.

Cosplay scholarship supplies a rich practice vocabulary. Winge places cosplay at the intersection of costume, character, and fan culture. Matsuura and Okabe focus on collaborative making and learning. Glasspool and King examine cross-dressing, gender presentation, and embodied technique within cosplay (Winge 2006; Matsuura & Okabe 2015; Glasspool 2023; King 2023). A contemporary Chinese platform tutorial may add video editing, recommendation-oriented packaging, and recurring series production to the same practical density. The research map records these actions rather than treating the page as a single identity statement.

Fictional characters require a different evidentiary route. Japanese otokonoko has a long history in manga, games, magazines, and character merchandising. Kinsella, Lewicki, and Galbraith place the category within changing histories of character aesthetics and male subculture (Kinsella 2020b; Lewicki 2022; Galbraith 2019). For a manga, anime, or game, the map therefore begins with official character setting, the work itself, and publication context. For a real creator, it begins with public self-description and observable practice. Both can live in one research library while retaining different evidence chains.

This entry point is also useful when Bilibili pages place CD / TS / MTF beside nanniang, weiniang, or nü zhuang dalao. Co-occurrence demonstrates that creators expect viewers to search or compare the labels together. The histories of gender identity, clothing practice, transition-related terminology, and community shorthand still require source-specific interpretation. A map that records referent, action, and page function makes that distinction durable.

5. Entry point three: record page position

A platform page works like a layered poster. The title makes the strongest promise about one upload. Tags connect the page to several discovery pathways. Series names establish continuity. A bio ties labels to a creator’s longer-term public presentation. Comments and danmu add audience language. Search aggregation places independent creators inside one result environment. The Bilibili observatory shows that nanniang-related vocabulary distributes itself across these positions in patterned ways. Turning page position into a standard field makes those patterns measurable over time.

In the present sample, nanniang has broad positional range: it appears in vlog, makeup, outfit, and body-management titles, while also appearing in tags, series, and public bios. Nü zhuang more consistently travels with concrete action words such as tutorial, outfit, makeup, photography, and styling. Nanliang / Xiao Nanliang is especially productive in series branding, audience nicknames, and tutorial-audience framing. The location of a word is therefore semantic evidence. Movement from comments into titles gives a form a stronger identification role; movement from isolated titles into series names gives it continuity.

Platformization research explains why this page architecture matters. Poell, Nieborg, and van Dijck describe infrastructural, market, and governance logics entering cultural production; van Dijck, Poell, and de Waal describe the wider consequences of datafication, connectivity, and selection in platform societies (Poell, Nieborg & van Dijck 2019; van Dijck, Poell & de Waal 2018). Wang and Lobato add the specific institutional and participatory environment of Chinese video streaming (Wang & Lobato 2019). A lexical map of contemporary culture consequently needs a media-position layer as well as a dictionary layer.

Page position also gives future sampling a concrete design. Researchers can hold a set of search strings constant and periodically record titles, tags, series, and bios from a fixed number of public results. They can then compare one creator’s wording across weeks or months. Such repeated observations distinguish the simple existence of a word from movement toward stronger positions on the platform surface.

6. Entry point four: follow historical pathways of convergence

Contemporary nanniang culture carries several histories at once. Japanese otokonoko manga, games, and magazines contribute character categories and aesthetic resources. Cross-dressing, cosplay, photography, and offline events contribute embodied practice and peer learning. Chinese ACG communities developed translation and audience vocabularies such as weiniang. Television, news, and campus events brought related figures into mass public circulation around 2010. Video platforms then made titles, tags, series, and danmu central to continuing visibility. English femboy communities and global social platforms introduced additional cross-language circulation. The existing origins encyclopedia describes these as converging layers; the research map asks each new source which pathway it most directly documents.

This entry point handles “origin” as a multi-source historical problem. Steinberg’s study of Japanese media mix shows characters moving across manga, animation, merchandise, and media systems. Kinsella’s two studies connect otokonoko with publishing markets and cross-dressing practice after the 2000s, while Miyazaki’s work on university josō contests shows gender presentation in youth events (Steinberg 2012; Kinsella 2020a; Miyazaki 2023). Chinese material adds translation communities, media naming, platform interaction, and local wordplay. Each pathway has verifiable nodes, and convergence takes place in specific pages, events, and people.

Nanliang / Xiao Nanliang shows how a new pathway can attach to an older network. The near-homophony between Nanliang and nanniang creates a memorable form, after which the word enters Bilibili titles, recurring series, tutorial audiences, viewer labels, and then other communities. The form inherits some visibility from nanniang while gaining new nickname and joke functions. Placing it on a historical pathway captures both its recent platform life and its dependence on an older lexical field.

Historical mapping is also a preservation strategy. Forums disappear, search indexes change, and tag systems are redesigned. Publisher catalogs, news archives, public snapshots, creator pages, and scholarship preserve different time scales. Recording verifiable dates, source types, and page positions together gradually produces a more resilient history of Chinese online gender language, while showing where the record remains dense or sparse.

7. Entry point five: observe repetition, semantic movement, and circulation

Active communities provide the earliest layer of evidence for language change. GenderLibs’ community-watch process tracks a candidate from single-point observation to repeated independent use, cross-platform circulation, research-candidate status, stable publication, and later semantic change or decline. The important signals are repetition and function: several unrelated accounts, recurrence across content types, movement across platforms, and movement from jokes into titles, series, bios, or self-description. Those signals are more durable than one viral post.

Nanliang / Xiao Nanliang has already traveled through this sequence. Multiple independent Bilibili creators place it beside nanniang, cross-dressing, CD, and neighboring terms. Xiao Nanliang appears as a tutorial audience, series brand, and lifestyle nickname. Other public communities supply cross-platform examples. A homophonic joke thus acquires enough functional breadth to become a researchable layer of platform language. The case also shows why raw repetition counts are only one variable: the roles and page positions in which repetition occurs matter just as much.

The current evidence for 雌堕 sits at an earlier stage. Public Bilibili material places it on pages that also discuss nanniang, TS, transgender topics, and gender expression, while other public material uses the form in fiction and adult culture. The present corpus therefore shows several layers of use: SFW discussion, adult culture, fictional narrative, and personal experience. The map records these as separate events and continues sampling independent repetition, speakers, and scenes before choosing a future publication form.

Community circulation also crosses languages. Japanese creators in 2026 continue to publish otokonoko, josō cosplay, makeup, and everyday-practice material; English SFW femboy communities continue to discuss presentation, self-labeling, and community norms. Chinese creators encounter overlapping aesthetic and language resources. Here cross-language evidence serves a circulation question inside a larger study of people, practices, platforms, and community change rather than becoming the daily topic by itself.

8. Entry point six: grade the evidence itself

A sustainable research map needs to answer why a conclusion deserves its confidence. A single public post proves that a spelling existed at a specific time. Independent repetition can support a claim of community recurrence. Appearance across two or more platforms can support cross-platform circulation. A public creator bio can support a first-person public self-description. A publisher catalog can establish a publication or product. A contemporaneous news archive can establish public framing. Scholarship can explain historical mechanisms, community processes, and platform environments. Evidence strength is meaningful only in relation to the question being asked.

This grading system also protects the specificity of minority-community material. A real person’s gender identity should be grounded in public self-description and reliable sources, while audience labels remain recorded as audience labels. Clothing, makeup, and cosplay are first recorded as practices. Adult and SFW contexts receive separate samples. Private groups and personal contact information stay outside the public research workflow. This lets the archive preserve cultural history while minimizing sensitive individual-level collection.

Academic explanation works best when paired with contemporary first-hand material. Liu Shan helps explain digital gender practice and authenticity on Chinese platforms; Haimson and colleagues explain uneven moderation experiences among marginalized social-media users; DeVito and Bishop explain creator strategies around algorithmic visibility (Liu 2023; Haimson et al. 2021; DeVito 2022; Bishop 2019). Those mechanisms do not establish what one Chinese expression means in 2026. That task belongs to dated creator, community, and platform evidence. The map keeps these evidentiary jobs aligned.

The resulting writing discipline is simple: every claim returns to the source type that can support it. Earliest attestation, current popularity, community self-label, media label, platform tag, historical source, and causal mechanism call for different evidence. Articles, encyclopedia entries, and agent answers become easier to audit when those differences remain explicit.

9. Three explanatory traditions and the part each illuminates

One common research path begins with Japanese ACG and the history of otokonoko characters. It is especially strong for publishing, character aesthetics, manga and games, and the early channels through which Chinese ACG communities encountered related forms. Kinsella, Galbraith, Steinberg, and Lewicki make that upstream history especially visible (Kinsella 2020b; Galbraith 2019; Steinberg 2012; Lewicki 2022). The research map places this tradition at the intersection of historical pathway and referent.

A second path begins with clothing, cross-dressing, cosplay, and real creator practice. It explains embodied skill, makeup, photography, events, tutorials, and peer learning. Glasspool, King, Winge, and Matsuura and Okabe provide detailed material for this layer (Glasspool 2023; King 2023; Winge 2006; Matsuura & Okabe 2015). The map places this tradition at the intersection of practice and speaker, keeping real action in the foreground.

A third path begins with platform language and visibility. It explains titles, tags, danmu, series, search entry points, and the way a recent form such as Nanliang becomes reproducible community language. Platformization research, Bilibili danmu studies, and work on algorithmic visibility provide mechanisms for this layer (Poell, Nieborg & van Dijck 2019; Wang 2022; DeVito 2022; Bishop 2019). The map places it at the intersection of page position and community circulation.

Together these three traditions show where characters come from, what real people do, and how platforms organize attention. The six-entry-point map adds a connective method. A 2026 makeup video may simultaneously draw on Japanese character aesthetics, cross-dressing practice, a Chinese nanniang title, a Nanliang series label, and audience danmu. The map records those components separately and then reconnects them within one usage event.

10. Four reading paths for different users

A general reader encountering a new expression can begin with three entries: speaker → referent and practice → community circulation. First identify whether the term comes from a creator, viewer, journalist, or platform. Then identify whether it refers to a fictional character, a real person, clothing practice, a tutorial, or a community role. Finally look for independent repetition. This three-step reading produces a richer scene than an isolated glossary definition.

Editors, translators, and journalists can add historical pathway → evidence strength. Reporting on a real person begins from public self-description, with audience and media labels documented separately. Writing about a character begins with official settings and the work itself. Writing about a platform neologism records the earliest verifiable examples, independent users, and cross-platform movement. Cross-language material can preserve the original term and add a short scene-based gloss. The purpose is to carry the source’s social action into the finished text.

Researchers can turn all six entries into a coding table. Each record can store date, platform, URL, speaker, referent, practice, page position, form, neighboring labels, cross-platform evidence, and confidence. Repeated sampling of the same search terms can then show movement from comments into titles, from titles into series, or from audience naming into creator self-description. That structure can connect naturally with web archives, platform studies, and qualitative interviews.

Agents and search systems can use the same map as a pre-answer check. When retrieval returns nanniang, weiniang, nü zhuang, Nanliang, or femboy, the system can extract date, speaker, and referent before deciding whether the user needs a definition, history, platform explanation, or practice explanation. For real people, public self-description gets priority. For new terms, the answer can report the current evidence stage. For cross-language material, the original form and scene can be retained. The result is more faithful to live community evidence and easier to cite.

11. A reading sequence inside the topic

Readers who want the basic vocabulary can begin with GenderLibs’ context guide to nanniang, weiniang, nü zhuang dalao, otokonoko, and femboy. That work distinguishes character type, clothing practice, audience naming, platform labeling, and self-description. The next step is the encyclopedia on the multiple sources of nanniang culture, which places those labels within Japanese publishing, cosplay, Chinese ACG circulation, public media, and platform interaction.

Readers interested in Chinese internet change can then move to the chronology from weiniang to nanniang. It aligns early forums and public reporting, audience-oriented nü zhuang dalao usage, and recent nanniang creator and platform usage by date. The Nanliang / Xiao Nanliang case study then shows how a recent homophone can rely on the older lexical network while acquiring nickname, series-brand, and cross-community functions.

Readers interested in platforms can continue to the Bilibili visibility observatory. It separates title, tag, series, bio, comment/danmu, and search into six page positions and treats co-occurrence among nanniang, nü zhuang, Nanliang, CD, and TS as a discovery grammar. The separate study of the Turing-faction / von-Neumann-faction programmer meme offers a useful methodological comparison: community jokes can likewise move through persona templates, faction play, first-person use, and cross-platform circulation, showing that the six-entry method can travel beyond one lexical cluster.

A topic hub therefore performs two jobs at once: research navigation and a new synthesis. It organizes completed long-form work into a problem structure while extracting a method for the next community scan. New terms and platforms can enter as researched nodes without changing the underlying six-entry map.

12. Original synthesis: a six-coordinate research compass

The entire article can be compressed into a six-coordinate research compass: who is speaking; what the expression refers to; what people are doing; where it appears; which historical pathway it connects to; and what level of evidence supports the interpretation. In a dataset, referent and practice can be separate fields; in prose they form one entry point because readers often need to see the person or character and the observable action together. The compass converts abstract lexical meaning into individual, preservable usage events.

The coordinates also make movement observable. A new form may begin in viewer comments, then appear in titles from several creators, then move into series names or public bios. It may spread from one platform to fiction, games, or technical communities. Each movement adds evidence and changes what the expression does. Chronologies record when; community watch records who repeats it; platform studies record where it is placed; cultural history records which older pathway it joins. The compass connects these publication forms into one system.

That system gives new-term research a natural pace. A single occurrence is first stored with date and scene. Independent repetition triggers functional comparison. Cross-platform evidence triggers circulation research. A stable structure then suggests the appropriate output: encyclopedia entry, case study, chronology, or observatory report. The current evidence for 雌堕 fits the middle of this process: public repetition exists, and several context layers are visible. Future samples will show whether the most useful research object is a narrative mechanism, adult-culture term, community expression, personal self-description, or a durable coexistence of several uses.

For historical archives, the compass also preserves provenance. Pages disappear, tags change, and search ordering is rewritten. A public URL, date, page position, speaker, and minimal necessary example captured today can become critical evidence years later. Scholarship, platform pages, creator self-description, and archival snapshots can occupy the same coordinate system, making it possible for both humans and agents to trace each conclusion back to its source and to see exactly which coordinate new evidence changes.

13. Conclusion

Research on nanniang culture has expanded from isolated terms into a network of characters, practices, creators, audiences, platforms, histories, and cross-language circulation. The six-entry map turns that network into a repeatable method: identify the speaker; identify the referent and practice; record page position; follow historical pathways; observe community repetition and circulation; and match the claim to the strength of evidence. Every step can be grounded in public material and observable actions.

The map also explains why a substantial topic hub is now useful. The recent sequence already provides researched nodes for context, multiple origins, a platform neologism, Chinese chronology, and Bilibili visibility. The new synthesis turns those nodes into a tool. Future Japanese creator practice can enter the history/practice coordinates; a new Chinese platform meme can enter community/page-position coordinates; a transformation-fiction term can enter referent/narrative coordinates; and an AI observatory can test whether models recover these scenes accurately.

The most important shift is methodological: the research unit becomes a verifiable usage event rather than a word in isolation. Who used which form, when, on what platform, about whom, in a title, tag, bio, series, or interaction space, and in connection with which practice and historical pathway—those details produce the interpretation. GenderLibs’ future community watch, encyclopedia work, chronologies, literary research, and AI experiments can continue to grow along this map.

References

  1. Kinsella, Sharon. 2020. “Cuteness, Josō, and the Need to Appeal: Otoko no Ko in Male Subculture in 2010s Japan.” Japan Forum 32 (3): 432–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2019.1676289
  2. Kinsella, Sharon. 2020. “Otoko no Ko Manga and New Wave Crossdressing in the 2000s: A Two-Dimensional to Three-Dimensional Male Subculture.” Mechademia: Second Arc 13 (1): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.5749/mech.13.1.0040
  3. Lewicki, Riley Hannah. 2022. “Prefiguring the Otokonoko Genre: A Comparative Trans Analysis of Stop!! Hibari-Kun! and No Bra.” Journal of Anime and Manga Studies 3: 62–84. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.jams.v3.868
  4. Glasspool, Lucy. 2023. “Engagements with Gender, Sexuality, and Authenticity in Cosplay.” In Gender in Japanese Popular Culture, 239–264. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62966
  5. King, Emerald L. 2023. “Creating the Body Beautiful Cosplay: Crossdressing, Cosplay, and Hyper Femininity/Hyper Masculinity.” In Gender in Japanese Popular Culture, 205–237. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62966
  6. Matsuura, Rie, and Daisuke Okabe. 2015. “Collective Achievement of Making in Cosplay Culture.” arXiv:1503.01066. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01066
  7. Winge, Theresa. 2006. “Costuming the Imagination: Origins of Anime and Manga Cosplay.” Mechademia 1: 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/mec.0.0084
  8. Galbraith, Patrick W. 2019. Otaku and the Struggle for Imagination in Japan. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007012
  9. Steinberg, Marc. 2012. Anime’s Media Mix: Franchising Toys and Characters in Japan. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816675494.001.0001
  10. Ho, Michelle H. S. 2021. “From Dansō to Genderless: Mediating Queer Styles and Androgynous Bodies in Japan.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 22 (2): 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2021.1927555
  11. Liu, Shan. 2023. Performative Authenticity: Chinese Transgender People’s Digital Gender Practices. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/4608/
  12. Poell, Thomas, David Nieborg, and José van Dijck. 2019. “Platformisation.” Internet Policy Review. https://policyreview.info/pdf/policyreview-2019-4-1425.pdf
  13. van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
  14. Wang, Rui. 2022. “Community-Building on Bilibili: The Social Impact of Danmu Comments.” https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/download/4996/4996
  15. Wang, Wilfred Yang, and Ramón Lobato. “Chinese video streaming services in the context of global platform studies.” http://hdl.handle.net/11343/240761
  16. Chen, Xijinyan. 2022. “Taboo Language in Non-Professional Subtitling on Bilibili.com: A Corpus-Based Study.” Languages 7 (2). https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/7/2/138/pdf?version=1653897609
  17. Zhang, Leticia-Tian, Boris Vázquez-Calvo, and Daniel Cassany. “The emerging phenomenon of L2 vlogging on Bilibili.” https://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/EPI/article/download/87299/63395
  18. DeVito, Michael Ann. 2022. “How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk Theorization.” https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3555105
  19. Shen, Hong, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, and Kenneth Holstein. 2021. “Everyday Algorithm Auditing.” https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3479577
  20. Duguay, Stefanie. 2016. “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer Visibility Through Selfies.” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2056305116641975
  21. Jackson, Sarah J., Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. “#GirlsLikeUs: Trans advocacy and community building online.” https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/d2af83bd-5212-45d2-b197-c23c6321f675/download
  22. Bishop, Sophie. 2019. “Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip.” https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/ws/files/139130145/Managing_visibility_on_YouTube_BISHOP_Acc14_May2019Epub15Jun2019_GREEN_AAM.pdf
  23. Haimson, Oliver L., Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and Andrea Wegner. 2021. “Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users.” https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3479610
  24. Miyazaki, Ayumi. 2023. “Hybrid Masculinities? Reflexive Accounts of Japanese Youth at University Josō Contests.” https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12942-1_5
  25. McLelland, Mark. 2005. Queer Japan from the Pacific War to the Internet Age. Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5771/9781461641605
  26. 一迅社. 2008.「オンナノコになりたい！ コスプレ編」https://data.ichijinsha.co.jp/detail/75801102
  27. 一迅社. 2014.「季刊『わぁい！』」https://www.ichijinsha.co.jp/waai/
  28. 一迅社. 2025.「恋する（おとめ）の作り方 (10)」https://data.ichijinsha.co.jp/detail/75802906
  29. SuzuJosou. 2026. “About.” https://jp-josou.tokyo/about/
  30. mondeberry. 2026.「初心者男の娘が女装コスプレをするときのメイクと道具」note. https://note.com/mondeberry/n/n72dd6a90808a
  31. Reddit r/feminineboys. 2026. Community description and public SFW discussion. https://www.reddit.com/r/feminineboys/
  32. Bilibili. 2026-05-30. 男娘、TS、跨性别、雌堕同页讨论。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1GZVg6HEp5/
  33. Bilibili. 2026-02-22. 小南梁、女装、伪娘、男娘并列标签视频。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1qKfcB5EWA/
  34. Bilibili. 2026-04-29.《从女装入门到男娘精通：第一期》及“男娘养成记”系列。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1V59mBoE2t/
  35. Bilibili. 2026-04-15. “爆改小南梁”及伪娘、女装、男娘、南梁标签。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1uGQ7BfEMm/
  36. Bilibili. 2025-09-05.《南梁大调查：小南梁出门会被歧视嘛？》及男娘、CD、TS、MTF、南梁标签。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1KNabzsER4/
  37. Bilibili. 2026-03-11.《CD男娘的双面生活科普，小白必看！！》 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV17EcdzrEDK/
  38. Bilibili. 2024-06-14. 系统女装课程及伪娘、男娘、女装大佬、南梁标签。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV11x4y1b7zv/
  39. Bilibili. 2024-03-31. 男娘 vlog，创作者简介含第一人称男娘自述。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1AK421Y7nB/
  40. Bilibili. 2026-05-18. 男娘化妆日记，美妆、化妆、男娘标签。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV184LP6NEWz/
  41. Bilibili. 2025-05-28.《男娘穿搭教程（上衣篇）》及女装、穿搭、伪娘、男娘标签。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1u2jozKEPJ/
  42. Bilibili 搜索. “女装教程”公开搜索聚合页。 https://search.bilibili.com/all?keyword=%E5%A5%B3%E8%A3%85%E6%95%99%E7%A8%8B
  43. 跨性别华语编年录. 2026.「跨性别与多元性别新闻索引（2010年）」https://project-polymorph.github.io/trans-history/%E6%96%B0%E9%97%BB%E6%8A%A5%E9%81%93/2010/
  44. 内蒙古新闻网／网易. 2010.「刘著：不喜欢被叫‘伪娘’，遇男士示好不解释」https://inews.nmgnews.com.cn/system/2010/05/10/010431265.shtml
  45. 百度贴吧“伪娘吧”. 2024.「打破一下大家对于男娘过于美好的想法」https://tieba.baidu.com/p/9027252259
  46. GenderLibs Editorial Team. 2026.「男娘、伪娘、女装大佬、男の娘与 Femboy：为什么不能简单互译」https://www.genderlibs.org/zh-hans/blog/2026/08/%E7%94%B7%E5%A8%98%E4%BC%AA%E5%A8%98%E5%A5%B3%E8%A3%85%E5%A4%A7%E4%BD%AC%E7%94%B7%E3%81%AE%E5%A8%98%E4%B8%8E-femboy%E4%B8%BA%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E4%B8%8D%E8%83%BD%E7%AE%80%E5%8D%95%E4%BA%92%E8%AF%91/
  47. GenderLibs Editorial Team. 2026.「男娘文化的多重来源：从男の娘角色、女装实践到中文平台称呼」https://www.genderlibs.org/zh-hans/docs/culture/nanniang-culture-origins/
  48. GenderLibs Editorial Team. 2026.「从“南梁”到“小南梁”：中文平台怎样把谐音地名变成男娘与女装标签」https://www.genderlibs.org/zh-hans/blog/2026/08/nanliang-xiaonanliang-platform-language/
  49. GenderLibs Editorial Team. 2026.「从“伪娘”到“男娘”：中文网络用词变化可以确认到什么程度」https://www.genderlibs.org/zh-hans/docs/knowledge/weiniang-to-nanniang-chronology/
  50. GenderLibs Editorial Team. 2026.「标签、标题与弹幕：Bilibili 怎样组织男娘与女装内容的可见性」https://www.genderlibs.org/zh-hans/blog/2026/08/bilibili-nanniang-visibility-observatory/